AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Crystal diskmark benchmarks1/30/2023 ![]() 0 * / SUM () OVER () AS, ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( ORDER BY DESC ) AS FROM sys. I think those would add up to mere small diferences and not almost double the difference. I cannot tell you any details about the configuration or setup such as (connectivity or brands of ssd). In my situation the desktop results were on a single SSD (Kingston) while the VM results were based off a virtual machine in a datacenter (All i know is we are suppose to be on SSD with that VM). I know there are other things that can result in differences such as (connectivity from VWARE host to storage array, or over/under commitment on a specific storage repository). The results on my desktop were faster even some of the results for the same test were nearly double. I ran some tests with crystaldiskmark on my virtual machine and then on my own desktop. This makes me believe this is all related back to disk i/o. These queries seem to affect other sessions I have confirmed that CPU/Memory are not at fault as well as Blocking. ![]() Our ERP still seems to be dragging when loading multiple generic inquiries at one time. I am trying to determine if the disk I/O represented by CrystalDiskMark is a accurate reflection of disk performance?
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |